A Word does not Word Anything


Life feeds on life, which feeds, of course, on the role of descriptive needs in the material need for the deprivation of goods which causes social exclusions as Honneth describes as ‘the struggle of recognition.” This relates primarily to the alienation and disenfranchisement of education and living standards which only perpetuates a guaranteed minimum income, or rather, a proposed system of redistribution, resulting in supplementations to government income. This is exemplified with issues in linguistic semiotics representing developing structuralism around the globe when they increase in methodological skepticism while covert real narratives shuttle between patriarchal and sexist phenomenology. Obviously, we see this method as a pejoratively measured description of a seemingly immobile and sclerotic political order. However, it is important to see what we can see, or rather, to know the boundaries of our linguistically assumptions about language. In other words, a word does not word anything. To word as action is to assume an unconscious apathy of the human spirit, to slave morality, and chain paradox—the essence of liberation. Therefore, from the outset, language has been condemnation, damnation of faculty, devoid of meaning and aesthetic value, the ultimate obscuration of objectified, subjectified truth, and discursivity, and similarly to the old bard, words are told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.

0 Response to "A Word does not Word Anything"

Powered by Blogger